INJUSTICE IN CANADA

 

Hon. Mr. Justice Michael Block breaks the law. 

 

If the Judge feels that recording is illegal, then he should have me charged under the relevant sections.  Why is he refusing to hear my case.?  First, he broke the law by ordering me not to record when I had the right to record. Then he refused to hear my case?  Why is he not in jail?

 

Hon. Mr. Justice Michael Block was not new to me.  In another parking infringement case, he had again broken the law by telling me that he will not hear my case if I recorded and then wrongly convicted me in a by law which had already been repealed many months prior to the day the ticket had been issued to me.  I had complained to the Ontario Judicial council against him in that matter and while the complaint was pending against him, he had decided to be my trial judge in this car accident case. 

 

On the 20th of December, 2019 I went to the Court in old City Hall room no 112 at 10.40 am for my car accident which took place on the 19th of July, 2018 almost seventeen months ago.  I had missed the court date on the 17th of December, 2019 as I was under medical treatment.  I produced the letter from the Hospital and the crown attorney in the office of the crown, accepted it for rescinding of the bench warrant.  After completing all formalities, I again went to court room no 112 at around 11.35 pm, where my case is usually heard.  At 12.19 pm I was told that my case was being transferred to courtroom no 117 to be heard by Hon. Mr. Justice Michael Block.  I immediately rushed there and Hon. Mr. Justice Block told me that the case will be heard only at 2 pm. (I misheard it as 2.30.pm.)

 

I was back in court at 2.20pm.  When I found the Crown Ms. Melissa Atkin walking out of the courtroom no. 117.  I explained to her that I had misheard the time as 2.30 pm as I usually have court hearings at 2.30 pm.  I went into the courtroom and explained to the Honorable Judge.  He asked me whether I was recording.  I explained to him yes as under section 136(2)b of the courts of Justice act, I had the right to record.  The Judge told me that he is ordering me to stop the recording.  I explained to him that he has to also function within the four walls of the constitution and the laws.  The law gave me the right to record and he did not have the power to forbid me from recording. 

 

The Crown Attorney Ms. Melissa Atkin intervened and told the Judge that, this has been an issue with other Judges as well and in her opinion, it was up to the Court to decide whether to permit me to record or not. 

 

The Judge told me that he had already dismissed my application for rescinding the bench warrant and will only reopen the issue, if I stopped recording.  I have been to court several times over the last three years, even if someone does not turn-up, the Judges give them some time before they dismiss the application.  What was is haste in dismissing it?  He, further explained to me that he wanted an accurate recording of the court’s hearings and did not want me to tamper with my recording at a later stage.  I explained to him that my recording was only for the purpose of supplementing my notes and there was no question of producing my recording at a later stage as evidence or sharing it with anyone else. 

 

The Honorable Judge Mr. Michael Block told me that he will have me removed from the court room if I did not stop recording.  I told him that if he calls the security and chases me out, I would have to leave.  The Judge told me, that was what he was going to do.  The security was called.  The security told me to leave and I left. 

 

Bench Hunting:

What surprised me was, even before I had informed the Judge that I was recording or going to record, how did the Judge know that I record my hearings for the purpose of supplementing my notes?  Secondly, my cases are always heard in 112 why was it shifted to 117.  Is it because the Crown Ms. Melissa Atkin felt that the Judge in 112 may not give an order favorable to her?   Cases should be randomly allotted by computer.  If in a Courthouse, for example, if, ten Judges have specialized in criminal law, ten in family law, ten in litigation, who among this ten will hear my case should be randomly allotted by computer.  Crown cannot select the docket; Judges cannot select the docket, that would be biased. 

 

When the Charter guarantees fair trial, how is the Crown, Ms. Melissa Atkin allowed to indulge in “Bench Hunting”?  Which law permits the crown to select a Judge of her choice so that she can be vindictive?  During lunch break, I saw Ms. Melissa Atkin in the corridor, she told me that she was going to oppose my application for rescinding the warrant.  Did she fear that the Judge in room 112 may not oblige her?    Why was my case moved from 112 to 117?  When the hospital has given the medical certificate, what is there for Ms. Melissa Atkin to contest?  Is she a layperson going to challenge the integrity of a Doctor? 

 

It was later that I came to know that Hon. Mr. Justice Michael Block had been the trial Judge for my case for the 17th of December, 2019 and that was the reason Ms. Melissa Atkin had decided to go to him.  Moreover, there were several members of the public as well as lawyers in court room 112 whom Ms. Melissa Atkin did not want to know how she was harassing and bullying me. 

 

INJUSTICE IN CANADA